https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413493 In preventive detention, only documents relied on for the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be furnished to the detenu, so non-supply of materials merely referred to in the grounds and relating to separate proceedings did not vitiate the detention order where no suppression of material facts was shown. However, an order rejecting bail in another case was a vital circumstance bearing on the likelihood of release from custody, and failure to place or consider it before the detaining authority amounted to non-application of mind. The judgment therefore sustained one detention order and quashed the other, granting only partial relief. en-us Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:43:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413493 In preventive detention, only documents relied on for the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be furnished to the detenu, so non-supply of materials merely referred to in the grounds and relating to separate proceedings did not vitiate the detention order where no suppression of material facts was shown. However, an order rejecting bail in another case was a vital circumstance bearing on the likelihood of release from custody, and failure to place or consider it before the detaining authority amounted to non-application of mind. The judgment therefore sustained one detention order and quashed the other, granting only partial relief. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413493