<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 529 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) orders. It confirmed that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules did not apply to LPG cleared under the Domestic LPG Subsidy Scheme. The Tribunal recognized LPG as a by-product, exempting it from Rule 6 requirements. Consequently, the refund claim for the reversed Cenvat credit was deemed valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 529 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) orders. It confirmed that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules did not apply to LPG cleared under the Domestic LPG Subsidy Scheme. The Tribunal recognized LPG as a by-product, exempting it from Rule 6 requirements. Consequently, the refund claim for the reversed Cenvat credit was deemed valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>