<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1767 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,66,30,684/- on account of project expenses. It found the expenses were revenue in nature, incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, and deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision aligned with previous judicial precedents and the Delhi High Court&#039;s rulings, emphasizing the business expediency of the expenses for the assessee&#039;s operations. The order was pronounced on 08/08/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1767 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,66,30,684/- on account of project expenses. It found the expenses were revenue in nature, incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, and deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision aligned with previous judicial precedents and the Delhi High Court&#039;s rulings, emphasizing the business expediency of the expenses for the assessee&#039;s operations. The order was pronounced on 08/08/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>