<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298124</link>
    <description>A demonstrated typographical error in the cause title and identity particulars of an ITAT order may be corrected by corrigendum where the correct assessee name and PAN are ascertainable from the record. The Tribunal found that the earlier order had mistakenly recorded those particulars and directed substitution of the correct name and PAN, thereby aligning the order with the true identity details reflected in the application and record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298124</link>
      <description>A demonstrated typographical error in the cause title and identity particulars of an ITAT order may be corrected by corrigendum where the correct assessee name and PAN are ascertainable from the record. The Tribunal found that the earlier order had mistakenly recorded those particulars and directed substitution of the correct name and PAN, thereby aligning the order with the true identity details reflected in the application and record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>