https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115 A foreign arbitral award was enforced in India despite objections that there was no concluded contract, no valid arbitration agreement, and no original certified agreement. Certified hard copies of email correspondence, supported by an affidavit, were treated as sufficient compliance with Section 65B of the Evidence Act and as certified copies of the arbitration agreement. The Singapore tribunal had already determined jurisdiction, the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, and the validity of the sole arbitrator; those findings had become final under Singapore law and could not be re-agitated in enforcement proceedings under Sections 45 to 48. No fraud, corruption, incapacity, or Indian public policy objection was established, so enforcement was upheld. en-us Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:56:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115 A foreign arbitral award was enforced in India despite objections that there was no concluded contract, no valid arbitration agreement, and no original certified agreement. Certified hard copies of email correspondence, supported by an affidavit, were treated as sufficient compliance with Section 65B of the Evidence Act and as certified copies of the arbitration agreement. The Singapore tribunal had already determined jurisdiction, the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, and the validity of the sole arbitrator; those findings had become final under Singapore law and could not be re-agitated in enforcement proceedings under Sections 45 to 48. No fraud, corruption, incapacity, or Indian public policy objection was established, so enforcement was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115