<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115</link>
    <description>The petition for enforcement of a foreign arbitration award was deemed maintainable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement, noting the Tribunal&#039;s prior determination. It affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction and authority, finding the awards final under Singapore law. The foreign arbitration award was held enforceable in India, not conflicting with public policy. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, enforcing the arbitration award as a court decree without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:56:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115</link>
      <description>The petition for enforcement of a foreign arbitration award was deemed maintainable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement, noting the Tribunal&#039;s prior determination. It affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction and authority, finding the awards final under Singapore law. The foreign arbitration award was held enforceable in India, not conflicting with public policy. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, enforcing the arbitration award as a court decree without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>