<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 508 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a real estate developer, allowing the adoption of the project completion method for income computation over the percentage completion method. It emphasized the consistency in the assessee&#039;s accounting method accepted by the Department in previous years and cited the High Court&#039;s decision supporting the use of AS-9. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made based on the incorrect application of the percentage completion method, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:29:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 508 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a real estate developer, allowing the adoption of the project completion method for income computation over the percentage completion method. It emphasized the consistency in the assessee&#039;s accounting method accepted by the Department in previous years and cited the High Court&#039;s decision supporting the use of AS-9. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made based on the incorrect application of the percentage completion method, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>