<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 485 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a refund claim for service tax paid, emphasizing the payment under protest and the extended limitation period. The Tribunal held that the limitation did not apply to the refund claims, directing the Adjudicating Authority to process the refund with interest within thirty days. The appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 485 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a refund claim for service tax paid, emphasizing the payment under protest and the extended limitation period. The Tribunal held that the limitation did not apply to the refund claims, directing the Adjudicating Authority to process the refund with interest within thirty days. The appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>