https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298114 The court held that reservations for categories other than those specified in Articles 16(4), (4A), and (4B) can be provided under Article 16(1), subject to valid classification tests. The Division Bench's opinion that Article 16(4) is exhaustive of all forms of reservation was overruled. The Government Order dated 06.10.2006, previously struck down, cannot be revived. The court also ruled that it cannot issue a mandamus to the Legislature or Executive to provide reservation. The petitions were dismissed, and no relief was granted to the petitioners. en-us Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:27:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298114 The court held that reservations for categories other than those specified in Articles 16(4), (4A), and (4B) can be provided under Article 16(1), subject to valid classification tests. The Division Bench's opinion that Article 16(4) is exhaustive of all forms of reservation was overruled. The Government Order dated 06.10.2006, previously struck down, cannot be revived. The court also ruled that it cannot issue a mandamus to the Legislature or Executive to provide reservation. The petitions were dismissed, and no relief was granted to the petitioners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298114