<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413426</link>
    <description>Where a claim for termination-related relief is founded on rights and consequences created by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the suit on merits. The suit in question was based on statutory requirements such as continuous service and protection against termination without compliance with retrenchment conditions, so the dispute fell outside civil court competence. A decree passed by a court without inherent jurisdiction is without legal force, may be treated as coram non judice even at the execution stage, and is unenforceable. The jurisdictional objection was therefore rightly accepted, and the decree was held to be a nullity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413426</link>
      <description>Where a claim for termination-related relief is founded on rights and consequences created by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the suit on merits. The suit in question was based on statutory requirements such as continuous service and protection against termination without compliance with retrenchment conditions, so the dispute fell outside civil court competence. A decree passed by a court without inherent jurisdiction is without legal force, may be treated as coram non judice even at the execution stage, and is unenforceable. The jurisdictional objection was therefore rightly accepted, and the decree was held to be a nullity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>