https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298108 Civil court jurisdiction was held unavailable for a suit challenging termination and seeking reinstatement or other consequential reliefs, because the claims fell within the industrial law framework. Once jurisdiction was absent, any decree or order passed by the civil court could not survive and had to be set aside. The Court rejected reliance on the earlier observation in Krishna Kant regarding pending matters, holding that later decisions had made clear that the consequence of want of jurisdiction must follow. en-us Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298108 Civil court jurisdiction was held unavailable for a suit challenging termination and seeking reinstatement or other consequential reliefs, because the claims fell within the industrial law framework. Once jurisdiction was absent, any decree or order passed by the civil court could not survive and had to be set aside. The Court rejected reliance on the earlier observation in Krishna Kant regarding pending matters, holding that later decisions had made clear that the consequence of want of jurisdiction must follow. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298108