https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298107 Section 9 CPC confers broad civil court jurisdiction, and exclusion is not readily inferred. Civil courts remain competent where an employee challenges dismissal on the basis of common law rights, breach of natural justice, or violation of mandatory constitutional or statutory requirements, even if industrial remedies may also exist. The exclusion principle applies more clearly where both the right and the remedy are created exclusively by the Industrial Disputes Act or similar enactments. As a statutory corporation is bound by Article 14, natural justice, and binding service rules, the termination was treated as illegal and the employee's civil suit was maintainable. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:19:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298107 Section 9 CPC confers broad civil court jurisdiction, and exclusion is not readily inferred. Civil courts remain competent where an employee challenges dismissal on the basis of common law rights, breach of natural justice, or violation of mandatory constitutional or statutory requirements, even if industrial remedies may also exist. The exclusion principle applies more clearly where both the right and the remedy are created exclusively by the Industrial Disputes Act or similar enactments. As a statutory corporation is bound by Article 14, natural justice, and binding service rules, the termination was treated as illegal and the employee's civil suit was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298107