https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298106 The Supreme Court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on the termination of service of a probationer under the Industrial Disputes Act. Decrees passed by the Civil Court were set aside, with no direction for reinstatement. Back-wages need not be recovered, but respondents are not entitled to further emoluments or benefits. The appeals were disposed of without costs, and the period spent in litigation would be excluded in case of future disputes. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:14:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298106 The Supreme Court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on the termination of service of a probationer under the Industrial Disputes Act. Decrees passed by the Civil Court were set aside, with no direction for reinstatement. Back-wages need not be recovered, but respondents are not entitled to further emoluments or benefits. The appeals were disposed of without costs, and the period spent in litigation would be excluded in case of future disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298106