https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413423 The court set aside the ex-parte order dated 24.08.2021, ruling in favor of the petitioner in a challenge under Section 129(3) of the UP GST Act, 2017 regarding ownership of seized goods. The petitioner's ownership claim was not duly considered, leading to the order being overturned. The respondent was directed to reevaluate the petitioner's claim and issue a new order within a week, emphasizing the necessity of fair assessment in such cases. en-us Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413423 The court set aside the ex-parte order dated 24.08.2021, ruling in favor of the petitioner in a challenge under Section 129(3) of the UP GST Act, 2017 regarding ownership of seized goods. The petitioner's ownership claim was not duly considered, leading to the order being overturned. The respondent was directed to reevaluate the petitioner's claim and issue a new order within a week, emphasizing the necessity of fair assessment in such cases. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413423