<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413414</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not meet the statutory requirements. The Petitioner had fully disclosed all material facts necessary for assessment, and the reassessment was deemed to be based on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, which was impermissible. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and order, ruling in favor of the Petitioner and disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413414</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not meet the statutory requirements. The Petitioner had fully disclosed all material facts necessary for assessment, and the reassessment was deemed to be based on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, which was impermissible. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and order, ruling in favor of the Petitioner and disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>