<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT (A) to determine the assessability of the income due to confusion over the real owner of the amount and the risk of double taxation. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, awaiting a definitive decision from the CIT (A) on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT (A) to determine the assessability of the income due to confusion over the real owner of the amount and the risk of double taxation. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, awaiting a definitive decision from the CIT (A) on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>