<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1909 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298101</link>
    <description>Fair market value of land as on 1 April 1981 for capital gains may be fixed on a reasoned estimate where exact comparable sales are unavailable. A valuation report based on speculative commercial-development assumptions was rejected because it lacked a reliable factual foundation for an industrial plot. The appellate valuation was sustained because it drew on nearby sale instances, recognised valuation references, the developed character of the area, and a reasonable annual rate of appreciation. The Tribunal stated that immovable property valuation is not an exact science and that surrounding material can support a defensible estimate. The adopted valuation was left undisturbed and both cross-appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1909 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298101</link>
      <description>Fair market value of land as on 1 April 1981 for capital gains may be fixed on a reasoned estimate where exact comparable sales are unavailable. A valuation report based on speculative commercial-development assumptions was rejected because it lacked a reliable factual foundation for an industrial plot. The appellate valuation was sustained because it drew on nearby sale instances, recognised valuation references, the developed character of the area, and a reasonable annual rate of appreciation. The Tribunal stated that immovable property valuation is not an exact science and that surrounding material can support a defensible estimate. The adopted valuation was left undisturbed and both cross-appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>