<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413343</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion and exclusion of specific comparables for benchmarking purposes and ordering a re-examination of working capital and risk adjustments. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature, and the challenge against the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was considered consequential and not requiring adjudication at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413343</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion and exclusion of specific comparables for benchmarking purposes and ordering a re-examination of working capital and risk adjustments. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature, and the challenge against the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was considered consequential and not requiring adjudication at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>