<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the goods as &#039;Base Stations&#039; under CTH 8517 61 00, rejected the application of the extended limitation period under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, and ruled the goods eligible for exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012. The appeal by Reliance Jio was allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the goods as &#039;Base Stations&#039; under CTH 8517 61 00, rejected the application of the extended limitation period under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, and ruled the goods eligible for exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012. The appeal by Reliance Jio was allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>