<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26813</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The deduction under section 80K was allowed on the gross dividend income, and the wife&#039;s share income from the partnership firm was not to be clubbed with the assessee&#039;s income. The court provided detailed reasoning based on legal precedents and interpretations of relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26813</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The deduction under section 80K was allowed on the gross dividend income, and the wife&#039;s share income from the partnership firm was not to be clubbed with the assessee&#039;s income. The court provided detailed reasoning based on legal precedents and interpretations of relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>