https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413313 The court denied the application for protection from arrest under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged offence, the risk of evidence tampering, and the necessity for a thorough investigation into the significant tax credit issue. The court found the respondent's arguments regarding the need for further interrogation and prevention of evidence tampering compelling, rejecting the applicant's contentions of coercion and demanded bribe as insufficient to halt the investigation. The decision prioritized national and societal interests over individual liberty, ultimately denying the protection from arrest. en-us Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413313 The court denied the application for protection from arrest under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged offence, the risk of evidence tampering, and the necessity for a thorough investigation into the significant tax credit issue. The court found the respondent's arguments regarding the need for further interrogation and prevention of evidence tampering compelling, rejecting the applicant's contentions of coercion and demanded bribe as insufficient to halt the investigation. The decision prioritized national and societal interests over individual liberty, ultimately denying the protection from arrest. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413313