<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 364 - DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, ROHTAK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413312</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to comply with investigation directives, appear before the Competent Officer of the respondent department, and allowed access to counsel during the investigation, emphasizing that counsel presence should not obstruct the process. The application seeking monitoring of the investigation was disposed of with these directions, ensuring both parties received a copy of the order for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 364 - DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, ROHTAK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413312</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to comply with investigation directives, appear before the Competent Officer of the respondent department, and allowed access to counsel during the investigation, emphasizing that counsel presence should not obstruct the process. The application seeking monitoring of the investigation was disposed of with these directions, ensuring both parties received a copy of the order for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>