<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413303</link>
    <description>The addition of business receipts was sustained because the assessee failed to produce a credible reconciliation linking amounts received from companies to alleged payments to landowners. The claimed additional evidence and hard disk did not establish the required nexus between the companies, vendors and assessee, and the relevant sale deeds and supporting details were not produced. The Tribunal also declined remand, holding that the additional evidence was not validly admitted under the Appellate Tribunal Rules and the hard disk was not certified as an electronic record under the Information Technology Act. The challenge to deletion of the addition therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 08:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413303</link>
      <description>The addition of business receipts was sustained because the assessee failed to produce a credible reconciliation linking amounts received from companies to alleged payments to landowners. The claimed additional evidence and hard disk did not establish the required nexus between the companies, vendors and assessee, and the relevant sale deeds and supporting details were not produced. The Tribunal also declined remand, holding that the additional evidence was not validly admitted under the Appellate Tribunal Rules and the hard disk was not certified as an electronic record under the Information Technology Act. The challenge to deletion of the addition therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>