<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413286</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Adjudicating Authority was confirmed due to the pre-existence of a dispute, liability clauses in the service agreement and indemnity bond, and adherence to principles from the Mobilox case. The Operational Creditor was directed to seek remedies in an appropriate court if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 08:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413286</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Adjudicating Authority was confirmed due to the pre-existence of a dispute, liability clauses in the service agreement and indemnity bond, and adherence to principles from the Mobilox case. The Operational Creditor was directed to seek remedies in an appropriate court if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>