<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413280</link>
    <description>A revisional order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was set aside because the authority did not show compliance with an earlier writ direction requiring a personal hearing before fresh decision. The Court found that the impugned order had been passed without demonstrating that the petitioner was heard, and therefore it could not stand. The matter was remanded for reconsideration de novo after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, in order to give effect to the prior judicial direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 08:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413280</link>
      <description>A revisional order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was set aside because the authority did not show compliance with an earlier writ direction requiring a personal hearing before fresh decision. The Court found that the impugned order had been passed without demonstrating that the petitioner was heard, and therefore it could not stand. The matter was remanded for reconsideration de novo after affording the petitioner a personal hearing, in order to give effect to the prior judicial direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>