<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 316 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413264</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the assessment order under the Value Added Tax Act, 2008, writ interference was declined and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy. The Court noted that a coordinate bench had taken the same approach in a similar matter. The petitioner was directed to prefer the appeal, and the Tribunal was asked to decide the pending appeal expeditiously. The appellate authority was also restrained from passing a final order for a limited period so the Tribunal&#039;s decision could be considered. Liberty to invoke Article 226 after the Tribunal&#039;s decision was preserved, subject to the Court&#039;s discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 316 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413264</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the assessment order under the Value Added Tax Act, 2008, writ interference was declined and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy. The Court noted that a coordinate bench had taken the same approach in a similar matter. The petitioner was directed to prefer the appeal, and the Tribunal was asked to decide the pending appeal expeditiously. The appellate authority was also restrained from passing a final order for a limited period so the Tribunal&#039;s decision could be considered. Liberty to invoke Article 226 after the Tribunal&#039;s decision was preserved, subject to the Court&#039;s discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>