<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 313 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413261</link>
    <description>A financier that repossesses and sells hypothecated vehicles and other assets under loan agreements is liable to value added tax where the sale falls within the broad statutory definitions of dealer, sale and turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The transaction is treated as a taxable disposal carried out under contractual rights, not as a mere agency arrangement for the borrower. Even on the assumption of agency, tax liability still arose because the sale was effected by the financier in exercise of its contractual rights without the borrower&#039;s consent. The assessment was upheld and the revision petitions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 313 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413261</link>
      <description>A financier that repossesses and sells hypothecated vehicles and other assets under loan agreements is liable to value added tax where the sale falls within the broad statutory definitions of dealer, sale and turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The transaction is treated as a taxable disposal carried out under contractual rights, not as a mere agency arrangement for the borrower. Even on the assumption of agency, tax liability still arose because the sale was effected by the financier in exercise of its contractual rights without the borrower&#039;s consent. The assessment was upheld and the revision petitions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>