<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413259</link>
    <description>The court directed the Customs Department to allow the petitioner to denature or mutilate the goods as per their request dated 03.07.2021. The Customs Department was instructed to release the goods after mutilation within two weeks, considering the petitioner&#039;s history of importing waste paper and their proactive stance, justifying a deviation from the usual adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413259</link>
      <description>The court directed the Customs Department to allow the petitioner to denature or mutilate the goods as per their request dated 03.07.2021. The Customs Department was instructed to release the goods after mutilation within two weeks, considering the petitioner&#039;s history of importing waste paper and their proactive stance, justifying a deviation from the usual adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>