<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant&#039;s activities, involving the deployment of personnel in a joint venture, were considered a capital contribution rather than taxable services. The Appellant&#039;s actions were deemed essential for the joint venture&#039;s operations and not as an independent service provider. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Appellant, and negated the service tax demand, interest, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant&#039;s activities, involving the deployment of personnel in a joint venture, were considered a capital contribution rather than taxable services. The Appellant&#039;s actions were deemed essential for the joint venture&#039;s operations and not as an independent service provider. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Appellant, and negated the service tax demand, interest, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>