https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298050 The court considered the scope of the second stay application in relation to the main writ petition challenging proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It found the second stay application aligned with the relief sought in the original petition and rejected objections to its maintainability. The court emphasized adherence to statutory pre-conditions for provisional attachment orders, highlighted the seriousness of attachment actions, and directed compliance with the Supreme Court's restrained order. The court ensured consistent treatment in proceedings involving the petitioner and another individual, Anil Kumar Gadodia, based on Supreme Court directives. en-us Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:22:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298050 The court considered the scope of the second stay application in relation to the main writ petition challenging proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It found the second stay application aligned with the relief sought in the original petition and rejected objections to its maintainability. The court emphasized adherence to statutory pre-conditions for provisional attachment orders, highlighted the seriousness of attachment actions, and directed compliance with the Supreme Court's restrained order. The court ensured consistent treatment in proceedings involving the petitioner and another individual, Anil Kumar Gadodia, based on Supreme Court directives. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298050