<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 294 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413242</link>
    <description>Orissa HC held that a concluded reassessment could not be reopened through a later recomputation of surcharge for the same assessment period merely because a subsequent Supreme Court ruling took a different view. The earlier reassessment, which had computed surcharge after set-off of entry tax against OST payable, had attained finality and was never challenged by the Department. On that basis, the fresh demand based on recomputation was unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 294 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413242</link>
      <description>Orissa HC held that a concluded reassessment could not be reopened through a later recomputation of surcharge for the same assessment period merely because a subsequent Supreme Court ruling took a different view. The earlier reassessment, which had computed surcharge after set-off of entry tax against OST payable, had attained finality and was never challenged by the Department. On that basis, the fresh demand based on recomputation was unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>