<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413237</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the acquittal judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge in a case involving a cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held the wife, the first accused, personally liable for issuing the cheque for her husband&#039;s debt, rejecting the argument that she acted as a mandate holder. Emphasizing the evidence presented, including the cheque, legal notice, and admissions, the Court reinstated the trial Court&#039;s conviction, highlighting the importance of establishing liability for dishonored cheques. The Criminal Appeal was allowed, restoring the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the presumption under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:16:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413237</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the acquittal judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge in a case involving a cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held the wife, the first accused, personally liable for issuing the cheque for her husband&#039;s debt, rejecting the argument that she acted as a mandate holder. Emphasizing the evidence presented, including the cheque, legal notice, and admissions, the Court reinstated the trial Court&#039;s conviction, highlighting the importance of establishing liability for dishonored cheques. The Criminal Appeal was allowed, restoring the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the presumption under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>