https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413235 The judge directed that the Revisional Order be kept in abeyance for twelve weeks, allowing the appeal before ITAT to proceed. The petitioner was granted permission to seek an expeditious disposal of the appeal, with no opinion expressed on the merits as ITAT was handling the matter. The judgment left open the question of ITAT's powers to grant stay, considering the provisions of the IT Act, and disposed of the writ petition and Writ Miscellaneous Petition with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413235 The judge directed that the Revisional Order be kept in abeyance for twelve weeks, allowing the appeal before ITAT to proceed. The petitioner was granted permission to seek an expeditious disposal of the appeal, with no opinion expressed on the merits as ITAT was handling the matter. The judgment left open the question of ITAT's powers to grant stay, considering the provisions of the IT Act, and disposed of the writ petition and Writ Miscellaneous Petition with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413235