<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413226</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions made by the lower authorities. The addition under section 41(1) for outstanding liabilities was deleted as no remission or cessation of trading liability was found. Additionally, the alleged on-money on the sale of flats was also deleted as the sale prices were justified by factors like location and buyer preferences, and the AO&#039;s addition lacked factual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413226</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions made by the lower authorities. The addition under section 41(1) for outstanding liabilities was deleted as no remission or cessation of trading liability was found. Additionally, the alleged on-money on the sale of flats was also deleted as the sale prices were justified by factors like location and buyer preferences, and the AO&#039;s addition lacked factual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>