<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 269 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, quashing the notice under Section 148 and canceling the assessment. It found the notice was based on suspicion without tangible material or sufficient reasons. Emphasizing the need for a reasonable belief supported by concrete evidence, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and deemed the Assessee&#039;s cross-objection infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 21:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 269 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, quashing the notice under Section 148 and canceling the assessment. It found the notice was based on suspicion without tangible material or sufficient reasons. Emphasizing the need for a reasonable belief supported by concrete evidence, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and deemed the Assessee&#039;s cross-objection infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>