<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26790</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for the remuneration dispute questions regarding assessment years 1969-70 to 1971-72, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions to be unsupported by evidence. However, for the set-off of short-term capital loss issue in the assessment year 1969-70, the court held that the set-off should be against income other than capital gains, benefiting the assessee. The court emphasized the distinction between short-term and other capital assets for set-off purposes and adopted a beneficial interpretation for the assessee in case of ambiguity, resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee for the set-off issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26790</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for the remuneration dispute questions regarding assessment years 1969-70 to 1971-72, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions to be unsupported by evidence. However, for the set-off of short-term capital loss issue in the assessment year 1969-70, the court held that the set-off should be against income other than capital gains, benefiting the assessee. The court emphasized the distinction between short-term and other capital assets for set-off purposes and adopted a beneficial interpretation for the assessee in case of ambiguity, resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee for the set-off issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>