<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413206</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the addition on account of the profit element from alleged purchases. The ITAT estimated the profit at 5% of the purchase value, considering the nature of the assessee&#039;s business as a trader in Iron and Steel. The decision aimed to achieve justice by aligning with industry standards, as the sales from the purchases were not disputed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413206</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the addition on account of the profit element from alleged purchases. The ITAT estimated the profit at 5% of the purchase value, considering the nature of the assessee&#039;s business as a trader in Iron and Steel. The decision aimed to achieve justice by aligning with industry standards, as the sales from the purchases were not disputed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>