https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298047 In testing a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court may examine the plaint and the documents relied on with it. Where the registered sale deed itself recorded receipt of full consideration, the plaintiffs' contrary plea was inconsistent with the record and amounted to an illusory cause of action; rejection under Order VII Rule 11(a) was therefore warranted. The suit was also time-barred because a challenge to cancellation and validity of a registered instrument had to be brought within three years from accrual of the right to sue, and the plaintiffs' own case showed accrual in 2009. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) was accordingly upheld. en-us Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298047 In testing a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court may examine the plaint and the documents relied on with it. Where the registered sale deed itself recorded receipt of full consideration, the plaintiffs' contrary plea was inconsistent with the record and amounted to an illusory cause of action; rejection under Order VII Rule 11(a) was therefore warranted. The suit was also time-barred because a challenge to cancellation and validity of a registered instrument had to be brought within three years from accrual of the right to sue, and the plaintiffs' own case showed accrual in 2009. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) was accordingly upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298047