<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 256 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413204</link>
    <description>A purchasing dealer&#039;s GST registration cannot be cancelled or refusal of revocation sustained merely because the selling dealer was later found fraudulent or non-existent. The Odisha GST Rules permit cancellation only on specific statutory grounds, and those grounds were not established against the purchaser. Where invoices were issued by a seller whose registration was then valid, the Department had to prove that the purchaser knowingly participated in the fraud or acted in connivance; mere reliance on alleged fake invoices or the seller&#039;s later cancellation was insufficient. The HC set aside the cancellation and appellate orders, restored registration, and allowed filing of pending returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 256 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413204</link>
      <description>A purchasing dealer&#039;s GST registration cannot be cancelled or refusal of revocation sustained merely because the selling dealer was later found fraudulent or non-existent. The Odisha GST Rules permit cancellation only on specific statutory grounds, and those grounds were not established against the purchaser. Where invoices were issued by a seller whose registration was then valid, the Department had to prove that the purchaser knowingly participated in the fraud or acted in connivance; mere reliance on alleged fake invoices or the seller&#039;s later cancellation was insufficient. The HC set aside the cancellation and appellate orders, restored registration, and allowed filing of pending returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>