<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 246 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413194</link>
    <description>The Court found that the assessing authority did not commit contempt by issuing a notice of demand before vacating the stay petition. Filing an appeal without disclosing the pendency of a writ petition was not contemptuous. Dismissal of the rectification petition was not contempt as it concerned different assessment years. The notice of demand was justified based on valid grounds and did not violate the interim order. The contemnor was discharged, allowing the petitioner to challenge the notice through legal avenues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 246 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413194</link>
      <description>The Court found that the assessing authority did not commit contempt by issuing a notice of demand before vacating the stay petition. Filing an appeal without disclosing the pendency of a writ petition was not contemptuous. Dismissal of the rectification petition was not contempt as it concerned different assessment years. The notice of demand was justified based on valid grounds and did not violate the interim order. The contemnor was discharged, allowing the petitioner to challenge the notice through legal avenues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>