<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 237 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413185</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the issue of deduction on depreciation from gross income estimated at 12.5% on main contractual receipts was a debatable question of law and fact. The Court concluded that the matter involved interpretation of legal principles and was not a clear mistake on record. Therefore, the invocation of jurisdiction under Section 154 was deemed unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 237 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413185</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the issue of deduction on depreciation from gross income estimated at 12.5% on main contractual receipts was a debatable question of law and fact. The Court concluded that the matter involved interpretation of legal principles and was not a clear mistake on record. Therefore, the invocation of jurisdiction under Section 154 was deemed unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>