<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 233 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413181</link>
    <description>The Court partially allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned part of the orders and remitting the matter back to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration in accordance with the law and after notice to stakeholders. All contentions were kept open, and costs were awarded in favor of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 233 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413181</link>
      <description>The Court partially allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned part of the orders and remitting the matter back to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration in accordance with the law and after notice to stakeholders. All contentions were kept open, and costs were awarded in favor of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>