<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 221 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal challenging the summary dismissal by CIT(A) and directed restoration if the Revenue could prove actual withdrawal. The ad hoc disallowance of expenses was partly upheld, with only conveyance expenditure sustained. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal against the disallowance of commission expenditure. The penalty appeal was allowed due to the unmaintainability of the disallowance and assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 221 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal challenging the summary dismissal by CIT(A) and directed restoration if the Revenue could prove actual withdrawal. The ad hoc disallowance of expenses was partly upheld, with only conveyance expenditure sustained. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal against the disallowance of commission expenditure. The penalty appeal was allowed due to the unmaintainability of the disallowance and assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>