https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298017 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is discretionary and is ordinarily not invoked where an equally efficacious statutory remedy is available. A challenge to rejection of an application under Section 70(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, concerning conversion of non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants, could have been pursued through the High Court's inherent and supervisory criminal jurisdiction under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code. On that basis, the writ remedy was treated as unwarranted, and the Court did not examine the merits. The writ petitions were therefore held not maintainable for availability of an alternative remedy. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:03:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298017 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is discretionary and is ordinarily not invoked where an equally efficacious statutory remedy is available. A challenge to rejection of an application under Section 70(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, concerning conversion of non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants, could have been pursued through the High Court's inherent and supervisory criminal jurisdiction under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code. On that basis, the writ remedy was treated as unwarranted, and the Court did not examine the merits. The writ petitions were therefore held not maintainable for availability of an alternative remedy. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298017