https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298009 A certificate under section 10 of the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, addressed to the Supreme Court was treated as valid because the abolition of Privy Council jurisdiction and the constitutional transition meant the pending matter and resulting authority devolved through the Federal Court to the Supreme Court as successor court. The Court also noted that the lands were recorded as watan property assigned as remuneration for the office of Patil, bringing them within the Act. As section 10 required cancellation on receipt of a valid certificate, the decree had to be cancelled insofar as it affected the Patilki office and the attached watan lands. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2021 11:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298009 A certificate under section 10 of the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, addressed to the Supreme Court was treated as valid because the abolition of Privy Council jurisdiction and the constitutional transition meant the pending matter and resulting authority devolved through the Federal Court to the Supreme Court as successor court. The Court also noted that the lands were recorded as watan property assigned as remuneration for the office of Patil, bringing them within the Act. As section 10 required cancellation on receipt of a valid certificate, the decree had to be cancelled insofar as it affected the Patilki office and the attached watan lands. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298009