https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413151 The court held that the complaint filed by GST authorities within 60 days constituted sufficient compliance with Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., denying the petitioners' entitlement to default bail. The court emphasized the distinction between a complaint and a charge-sheet, highlighting the authority of GST officers to file complaints under the GST Act. The petition challenging the rejection of default bail was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413151 The court held that the complaint filed by GST authorities within 60 days constituted sufficient compliance with Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., denying the petitioners' entitlement to default bail. The court emphasized the distinction between a complaint and a charge-sheet, highlighting the authority of GST officers to file complaints under the GST Act. The petition challenging the rejection of default bail was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413151