<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 199 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413147</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the right to deposit tax and penalty before goods are confiscated. It directed provisional release of goods under Rule 140(1) of CGST Rules, allowing appeal against confiscation. The court instructed that goods should be provisionally released pending appeal outcome, with the Bank Guarantee safeguarded until final disposal. It also stressed the need for prompt appeal resolution by the Appellate Authority within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 199 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413147</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the right to deposit tax and penalty before goods are confiscated. It directed provisional release of goods under Rule 140(1) of CGST Rules, allowing appeal against confiscation. The court instructed that goods should be provisionally released pending appeal outcome, with the Bank Guarantee safeguarded until final disposal. It also stressed the need for prompt appeal resolution by the Appellate Authority within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>