<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 178 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413126</link>
    <description>The Court remanded the matter back to the Respondent for a reasoned order within six weeks, emphasizing that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits. The Court clarified that all rights and contentions were left open for further legal proceedings if the petitioner remained aggrieved by the decision of the Respondent, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 178 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413126</link>
      <description>The Court remanded the matter back to the Respondent for a reasoned order within six weeks, emphasizing that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits. The Court clarified that all rights and contentions were left open for further legal proceedings if the petitioner remained aggrieved by the decision of the Respondent, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>