<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 176 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413124</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and ITAT, confirming the deletion of disallowance under Section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Court agreed that TDS was not required on provisions made for expenses of the relevant year and noted that TDS had been deducted in subsequent years upon actual payments. Finding no errors in the Tribunal&#039;s application of principles, the Court dismissed the appeal for lacking merit or raising substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 176 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413124</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and ITAT, confirming the deletion of disallowance under Section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Court agreed that TDS was not required on provisions made for expenses of the relevant year and noted that TDS had been deducted in subsequent years upon actual payments. Finding no errors in the Tribunal&#039;s application of principles, the Court dismissed the appeal for lacking merit or raising substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>