<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413117</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, remitting the matter for a fresh decision. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s characterization of the release deed as a colorable device and emphasized proper adjudication based on legal precedents. The Court did not address the substantive legal questions but disposed of the appeal by remitting the case for reconsideration by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413117</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, remitting the matter for a fresh decision. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s characterization of the release deed as a colorable device and emphasized proper adjudication based on legal precedents. The Court did not address the substantive legal questions but disposed of the appeal by remitting the case for reconsideration by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>