https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59956 Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which had prevented determination of ALP of these transactions - considering the practical difficulties in furnishing the segment wise details of AE segment and non-AE segment transactions in diamond industry, no penalty under Sec. 271G could justifiably be imposed for failure to furnish the said information - we confirm the impugned order deleting the penalty u/s 271G - AT en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:41:33 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:41:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59956 Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which had prevented determination of ALP of these transactions - considering the practical difficulties in furnishing the segment wise details of AE segment and non-AE segment transactions in diamond industry, no penalty under Sec. 271G could justifiably be imposed for failure to furnish the said information - we confirm the impugned order deleting the penalty u/s 271G - AT Highlights Income Tax Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:41:33 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59956